Search for: "In re Robert B." Results 601 - 620 of 2,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 12:03 am
(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), a person who knowingly violates this chapter commits a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Wild rumors abound: Lord Commander Roberts will be betrayed by those closest to him; a tenacious effort to resist the tide of history at the highest court in the land (not this one) will come up short; a tradition of confidentiality will be breached; and the quiet one will end months of silence with a statement that no one expected. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Robert Monks is the founder of Lens Governance Advisors, a law firm that advises on corporate governance in the settlement of shareholder litigation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
“Well, we’re ready,” Roberts replies. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elissa Slotkin’s campaign captures the upcoming fundraising scene in Washington perfectly: “You’re about to be inundated. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:23 am by Kevin Goldberg
While broadcasters are exempt from such performance royalties for their broadcast programming, they’re still on the hook for those royalties for recorded performances that they retransmit on the Internet. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:11 am
We're usually round the back if it's free. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 10:22 am by Cory Doctorow
., where a jurist named Robert Bork found the ear of President Reagan and a coterie of elite legal insiders and began to fundamentally reshape US antitrust law. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:30 pm by Administrator
The Plaintiffs Jerzy Robert Zaniewicz and Edward C. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Evan Lee
” Thus, both Alito and Roberts seem to be persuaded that the government should win based on what might be labeled a “tracking” theory – that Congress meant in Section 2252(b)(2) to “track” similar language elsewhere that everyone agrees covers convictions involving both adults and minors. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
  Here's my best shot at untangling it:  As I read his analysis of "third party" cases, he would hold that if Party A "entrusts" information about herself to Party B and has a reasonable expectation that Party B will keep it "private"--and a concomitant "positive law right," based upon a promise or contract or property right or statute, that Party B will honor the confidentiality of the information by not sharing it… [read post]