Search for: "Jacobs v Grant" Results 601 - 620 of 819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Jacobs, “Toward a Process-Based Approach to Failure-to-Warn Law,” 71 N.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Yee 15-169Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in this case should be granted, vacated, and remanded in light of Horne v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 2:50 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The ruling is important for employers in the wake of the EEOC’s focus on Equal Pay Act issues. *** In E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
The Board unconvincingly distinguished Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
It affirmed the order granting respondent’s cross-motion for interim counsel fees to the extent of awarding her $200,000. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The allegations that Duma had acted corruptly and fraudulently in the grant of a petroleum licence were found to be false. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 3:18 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
 In Jacobs v Cartalemi, the Court held that the “right to an accounting is premised upon the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship and a breach of the duty imposed by that relationship respecting property in which the party seeking the accounting has an interest. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
The settlement would also grant $4.6 million in fees to the lawyers for the plaintiffs, a group of independent artists and filmmakers who filed separate suits in 2013 that were later combined. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Inevitably, this assessment will mean that survey evidence is not as useful as it may have once been, but as Sir Robin Jacob said in his judgment in the same case, the survey is not completely dead, as it is still “possible to conduct fair surveys and they may indeed lead to witnesses of value”.Mr Mellor QC rounded off the evening by sneaking in a 2014 offering. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Florian Mueller
Before I'll share the latest documents and observations relating to the FTC's motion for partial summary judgment on Qualcomm's obligation to grant standard-essential patent (SEP) licenses to rival chipset makers, an update on Qualcomm's attempts to gain leverage over Apple (and, by extension, Intel) through injunctive relief in Germany:In Wednesday's "Mannheim Steamroller" post, I've meanwhile corrected a typo: I obviously meant to say that the… [read post]