Search for: "Merrill v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2007, 8:59 am
Launched in October 2007, this is the blog of Mark V. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Here’s administrative scholar Thomas Merrill on FTC competition rulemaking. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:33 am
eDiscovery News Context for Considering Discovery A Revised Version of My Alternative EDRM Model - http://tinyurl.com/2c8kzbe A State Court Judge’s View on e-Discovery (Part One) - http://tinyurl.com/23cmd2v Ahhh– We have to Review the Text Messages for Mr. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
In contrast, Bill Robinson, a respected lawyer and representative of businesses in Russia since 1990, thinks that nationalization is an insignificant risk and one which is easily insurable.[32]  Although there has been increasing state ownership in strategic sectors like aerospace, "national champions" of private industry such as energy and metals continue to grow alongside with these state giants. [33] Though the government is reasserting its position and… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
At the moment, the law across Europe about how to decide what is and is not patentable is not settled, even though the same law should effectively apply in all member states of the EPC (comprising all 27 EU states together with a few other non-EU states). [read post]