Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Some of the documents Chevron sought were not located in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
” Jennifer Harris asked if it’s time for new rules regarding Chinese investment in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:52 pm
§ 2510(9) as: (a) a judge of a United States district court or a United States court of appeals; and (b) a judge of any court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State who is authorized by a statute of that State to enter orders authorizing interceptions of wire, oral, or electronic communications; That definition tells you what judges can issue wiretap orders — for example, Article III district and circuit judges but not… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:54 am
The latest statistics from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on ex parte re-examination show that 92% of requests for reexaminations are granted. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
Either way, the South Korean bill doesn't help developers or consumers in the slightest as things stand.The South Korean parliament needs to amend its bill or Google will be laughing all the way to the bank.And there's a geopolitical issue here: South Korea is somewhat dependent on the United States (not just for military reasons). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am
They partnered together and sold their software as a single unit. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
Microsoft Corp. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:20 am
In that connection, I should note the Microsoft case (United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 10:45 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
