Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:13 am
As Lord Mance in PJS v NGN [2016] 2 WLR 1253 “there is not, without more, any public interest in a legal sense in the disclosure or publication of purely private sexual encounters, even though they involve adultery or more than one person at the same time” [32] Furthermore, the fact that Mr Vaz is a Member of Parliament cannot, of itself, deprive him of his privacy rights. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 6:51 pm
(I once had Joshua Locke, the student denied a scholarship in Locke v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The second is that the names of the people whose cases are being decided, and others involved in the hearing, should be public knowledge. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It is, of course, true that, after the horrors of the 1914-18 conflagration, many people wanted simply to avoid another war at all costs. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
More than 30,000 people entered immigration detention in 2015. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The result – which was positive for GS – is potentially of considerable assistance for similar people. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
This is a guest post by Allan Norman of Celtic Knot following the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The Christian Institute and others (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
Judgment has now been handed down in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, in which Regulations made under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) were challenged. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:18 am
On appeal from: [2015] CSIH 64 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal, in a case where four registered charities with interests in family matters and three individual parents challenged the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2012, which made provision for a named person to be assigned to each child and young person in Scotland. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
The Bill is currently going through the House of Lords where new amendments are being debated. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
But people who could not get justice in the courts started to come to the chancellor asking for relief. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am
With reference to judicial inconsistency on a point of disclosure in the judgment of Vernon v Bosley , Lord Neuberger then demonstrated that litigation best practice had in some areas been left in a “state of complete uncertainty”. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:20 am
Lord Neuberger gave the only judgment. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week the Daily Mail published a clarification about the article which said: “An article published on May 26 described Lord Sugar as a ‘spiv’. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
When the Reynolds defence was first decided, in the first few cases after the decision was handed down, the defence failed and had to go all the way back up to the House of Lords for the judges of the House of Lords to say to lower courts you are not getting it. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
City West Housing Trust v Massey [2016] EWCA Civ 704 When considering a suspended possession order, how should the judge exercise their discretion where the tenant’s evidence has been disbelieved, in whole or part? [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the only judgment. [read post]
