Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 601 - 620 of 30,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2009, 10:06 am
Plus, assuming good behavior, the guy who actually committed the murder may well be out by then, since he got 25 to life as part of his plea deal. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:35 pm
Here, it's reasonable to assume that there's something fishy going on, and that M.D. might well be in trouble. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
 Litigators know only too well the problems with doctrine and the courts’ composition that keep holding them back, but they imagine a silver bullet exists in the legislative arena, which they know far less well. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm
 You might think it's only applicable (if at all) to people who actually steal property. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
  Why it's not easier to attempt to shoplift at a 7-11, or liquor store, or Rite-Aid, is unclear to me.There's clearly something "off" to the court as well. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:46 pm
  So just introduce the basic evidence, rest, and declare victory.But what makes the case even weirder (to me) is that the prosecutor goes ahead and introduces other (freaky) evidence as well:"Before trial, the prosecutor sought admission of the photographs recovered from defendant’s devices. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
 You can see why reasonable minds might well differ on the right result.On the one hand, there's the reason Mary H. got committed to the psychiatric facility in the first place. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:03 pm
. - The mother got a long sentence in prison as well. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
 Not necessarily one that makes everything make sense, but that's a big part of the story as well. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
 Seems to me like you can just charge the guy again with basically the exact same thing the next day.Now, maybe the answer is "Well, okay, but it's gotta be a new proceeding, not merely an extension of his prior commitment. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
 Which is why even trained lawyers like the prosecutor and defense counsel disagree on what it says.But the trial judge simply reads the instruction to the jurors and lets these legally untrained folk figure out for themselves what even two lawyers and a judge couldn't resolve.At which point the Court of Appeal typically says:  "Well, we presume the jury followed the properly given instructions. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:47 am
You don't see AUSA's, of all people, typically sue for age discrimination. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
There are a lot of freakishly bright people out there who might well be willing to put in the time to help identify the correct answer to these queries.If I taught evidence, and was really mean, I might make this an assignment to my class. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:39 pm
Not many people are going to get to the door within five seconds at 6:30 in the morning. [read post]