Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 601 - 620 of 1,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the Court of Appeal, Second District Division 4 California: People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Pamela Devata and Stacey L. Blecher
If adverse impact is demonstrated, the burden shifts to the employer to demonstrate that its policy is “job related and consistent with business necessity,” and tailored to the specific circumstances, taking into account factors such as those set forth in Green v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:26 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This Friday’s Five focuses on five lessons employers should take away from the Zetwick v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Blocking order, The Football Association v British Telecommunications [2017] EWHC 480 https://t.co/DgEd4Q3Oz4 -> Who Does OpenMedia Really Speak For? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
Offense that are potentially illegal or life threatening are sent to Sony’s security team, which is what happen with Stratton’s offense. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:55 am by Kevin Johnson
The amici argue that when there is a “readily apparent” federal definition of an offense, the Supreme Court will apply it, as it did in in Taylor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
This post examines an opinion from the California Court ofAppeal – Second District: People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
In 1943 and 1944, he was an instructor in aeriel navigation and physical education for Naval Officers enrolled at UVA under the V-12 program. [read post]