Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown" Results 601 - 620 of 3,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 9:17 am
And while most judicial opinions will not — and need not — consciously engage with these multiple constitutional audiences, this framework illuminates why certain opinions such as Brown v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:26 am
 After becoming the NAACP's chief legal counsel in 1938, Thurgood Marshall won several landmark court cases in the late 1940's and early 1950's banning segregation, including Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
”That had to leave a very bad taste.# # #People v P. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Desautel, 2019 BCCA 151, 2021 SCC 17 (38734) Whether a group is an Aboriginal people of Canada is a threshold question, in the sense that if a group is not an Aboriginal people of Canada, there is no need to proceed to the Van der Peet test. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
Had politics been allowed to play a role in the court’s decision-making process, the outcome of Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
Had politics been allowed to play a role in the court’s decision-making process, the outcome of Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  For Dworkin—and many American constitutional theorists of the second half of the twentieth century—the existing story made Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]