Search for: "US v. Rose"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
For example, Randall v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
" Rose also noted that same-sex couples can now marry in Massachusetts and Connecticut, implying that use of the term "marriage" to refer to a legally-united same-sex couple is becoming an accepted part of the definition of the word "marriage. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
Chambers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
Plaintiff alleged that “[her] fee bore no rational relationship to the product delivered,” and detailed that, in exchange for the $25,000 fee, defendants produced only a draft complaint that was essentially identical to the one that she had presented to them (see Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 9:36 am
Whitewater v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Cerny v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Samson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
Norton Rose sends clients home after training cock-up… I quote… There were red faces at Norton Rose this week when clients who had turned up for a training session were left waiting around before finally being sent home. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Can you talk about police training and use of force? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
” As to the penalty imposed, dismissal, the Appellate Division said that “on the record before us, we do not find the penalty of termination shocking to the judicial conscience,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, and Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:46 am
Golden v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Paula-Rose Stark of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
Last week, the IPKat certainly supplied us all with an abundance of trade mark law updates! [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Vancouver Community College v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 7:49 am
Rose Hughes commented on an EPO Board of Appeal decision shedding light on standards of proof in cases of alleged prior use. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Whereas Weird Al’s Grammy-winning song fits snugly within the parody definition (and Yankovic always seeks permission, in order “to maintain relationships”), Dumb Starbucks position is questionable.ParodyIn the landmark decision addressing fair-use in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc the US Supreme Court stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one… [read post]
