Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 601 - 620 of 2,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:54 am
A gay man from Mexico who is enrolled in an HIV clinical drug trial at the University of Minnesota failed to win asylum in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm by Beck, et al.
The court said “unh-unh,” granted the preliminary injunction, and concluded: [T]he plaintiffs are substantially likely to succeed on their claim that FDA cannot regulate and thereby exclude their electronic cigarettes from the United States on the basis that those products are an unapproved drug-device combination under the FDCA.2010 WL 129667, at *10. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:33 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
  Although the United States Patent and Trademark Office has granted patent claims to such products generated by in vivo conversion of ingested drugs, and courts have noted the eligibility of such products as patentable subject matter, never has a United States court of final appeal upheld such a patent claim as valid, enforceable, and infringed. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Sanade, Harrison & Walker v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 00048(IAC) – Read judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm by Robert Hambrick
 Van Gogh, Pot Pipe, 1887First, it's important to note that at least one recent case, Kentucky v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
"This article explains that the 11th Circuit in the case of Main Drug, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, the Court has been again asked to interpret the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
Article I, section 17 of the Florida Constitution provides that: "The prohibition against cruel or unusual punishment, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, shall be construed in conformity with decisions of the United States Supreme Court which interpret the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment provided in the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]