Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:25 am
The Supreme Court in Zadvydas, found that indefinitely detaining non-citizens who entered the United States would potentially violate their due process rights. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
United States - concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act and state convictions for batteryBloate v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:38 am
The post Sixth Circuit Reviewed: Net Neutrality and “Waters of the United States” appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Facts: This case (Harris Caprock v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Id. at pp. 53–54; accord, Davis v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
A: United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:32 pm
Davis, 132 F.3d 1092 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:28 am
Davis, 2005 WI App 98, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (2005); State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
