Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 601 - 620 of 865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Thus for example, in a set of phrases that will be familiar to many readers, Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes wrote in his dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
” Fans of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle will recognize that iterative disjunctive syllogism is nothing other than the process of elimination, as explained by Doyle’s fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Comme l’a dit le juge Holmes, il y a plus de soixante ans, le fait que la teneur particulière du message d’une personne puisse [TRADUCTION] “inciter à l’intolérance” n’est pas une raison pour lui refuser la protection car [TRADUCTION] “s’il existe un principe de la Constitution qui exige de façon plus impérative le respect que tout autre c’est le principe de la liberté de pensée… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
BSN Medical Limited and BSN Medical GmbH (EPLAW)   United States US General Year ahead: Range of IP policy issues may see action in United States in 2010 (IP Watch) Conan O’Brien wants to keep his IP (Daily Dose of IP) Invent Help sues patent blogger, Gene Quinn (The Invent Blog)   US Patents Director Kappos on USPTO’s (lack of) funding (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IAM) When the examination process goes south (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
In lieu of granting leave to appeal the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in People v McKinney, concluding that the defendant’s statement that he would “just as soon wait” until he had an attorney before talking to the police, followed immediately by his statement that he was willing to discuss the “circumstances,” was not an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel or a statement declaring an intention to remain silent under Davis v… [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:46 am by Terry Hart
Solicitor General responded to the Supreme Court of the United States’ request last October for guidance on whether it should take up the case of Lenz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States, the case which upheld the right of employers to forbid workers by contract from joining labor unions and struck down the federal law banning these “Yellow Dog” contracts while seven years later, upholding a similar state law in Coppage v. [read post]