Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 601 - 620 of 1,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm by Mark Murakami
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
  In short, the Ninth Circuit held that the states (Washington and Minnesota) had standing and met the requirements for a preliminary injunction (styled a temporary restraining order in the district court). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Last week, EFF, ACLU, and ACLU of Minnesota filed an amicus brief in State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
 In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
  The combination of the jock tax and differences between how states tax its residents may make some cities in the United States and in Canada more attractive than others. [read post]