Search for: "West Virginia v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
As of this date, Pennsylvania, Washington, and West Virginia have applied for Appendix K waivers and received approvals from CMS.[6] Medicaid Disaster State Plan Amendment Template Each Medicaid program has a state plan which describes the state’s rules related to eligibility, benefits and payments. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-1294 (concerning jury instructions for conspiracy to distribute controlled substance analogues); West Virginia Dep’t of Heath and Human Resources v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 8:29 am by Kalvis Golde
United States, Won asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 2nd Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am by William Eskridge
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Robert Jackson, who had replaced Stone on the bench, systematically disassembled Frankfurter’s reasoning in his majority decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by Douglas Jarrett
   Verizon has essentially frozen its FiOS buildout and has exited the local landline business in four states: Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire and West Virginia. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by Hanna May
CMS stated in the memorandum that it has appealed both decisions, the State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]