Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 2:21 am
The Complainant in Juicy Details B.V. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
There are obvious parallels with the famous “Pentagon Papers” case, New York Times v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:04 am
This beaming bride is the daughter of First Circuit Judge Kermit V. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Valley Forge Historical Society v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:49 am
-based businesses,” AutoZone Parts, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
Alex Sink v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
Naylor, Jr. is a Washington state software engineer who holds a number of patents. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
As far as we are aware, this is the first example of a purely “private” intervention in a private law case in the English courts. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Neither the parties nor the dispute had any connection with England or English law. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
In the case of Mink v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
Finally, the report argues that sharia tribunals often operate otherwise than as a private religious supplement to the civil legal system, that councils may make decisions which explicitly contradict the provisions of English law, even in areas such as child custody and that they may, in particular, claim religious authority to do so. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
Evidence as to the use of serial commas by newspapers tells us nothing about the social state thereof. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
Sean Wajert tells us of a remarkable failure-to-warn case, Steven Morris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
The case of Sanghe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
This is what happens in the United States where state defamation law has been eclipsed by federal free-speech law (the First Amendment). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(G 1/10) (IPKat) Another referral to the EBO, allowability of disclaimers (G 01/03) (IPKat) EPO: English version of notice concerning communications under amended Rule 161 EPC (IPKat) Eased patent translation requirements proposed in Europe (Inovia IP) (Patentology) Bloggers or Blaggers? [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:25 pm
For the full text of the case please see State v Marquez. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
Justice Stevens stated that Webster's definition was likely to convey a message similar to the meaning of the word "manufactures" in the earlier English statute. [read post]
