Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 11,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
Only a few years ago it was rare for a ruling in an intellectual property case to be issued within 22 months. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
This article analyses how a young man who might have been marginalized in society because of the circumstances of his birth, ethnic origin, and religious identity rose to prominence in law, politics, and business in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:20 am
ThermoLife International LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:09 am
The court fulfilled its prophecy a few months later, ordering EDMC to continue to guarantee the notes and pay them in full. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm
It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
Elena MolinaA few days ago The IPKat reported that Spain has now adopted the final text of a law that will enter into force on 1 January 2015, and significantly reform its IP law system. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
MIP doesn't stipulate whether the list is of people exercising a good influence or a not-so-good one [this small but subtle point may be of interest to European Patent Office employees]. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:36 pm
Noel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
Despite these minor glitches, the book is a worthy guide for those interested in a study of intellectual property law. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
Rptr.2d at 80-81 (various citations omitted).The California Supreme Court got its hands on the same question a few years later in Dowhal v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Pineiro v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:31 pm
-- State that the requested injunctive relief to stop these wrongs will serve the public interest, and state why this is the case. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
* State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:53 pm
* State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
The program for the reenactment gives due acknowledgement to two scholarly pieces on the case, which anyone interested in all the peculiar details should consult: “Georgia v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
C.N. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:37 pm
Introduction There are very few requirements for a business to be incorporated in a given state. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am
Competence is not a binary state – a lawyer is not either competent or incompetent, and no lawyer has reached a state of perfection. [read post]
