Search for: "Love v. State" Results 6181 - 6200 of 9,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Second, s. 167(6) which says that, subject to s. 167(1)-(5) and regulations made by the Secretary of State, “… the authority may decide on what principles the scheme is to be framed. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
However, the coalition has no face to lose upon the failure of a scheme that was the love-child of the rather unpopular previous government. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am by Jay Stanley
United States — we argue that tracking individuals in the way that this technology does is something the government cannot do without a warrant. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]