Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 8,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
The question centers, as it has for centuries, on the use of the criminal law to embed social conventions into the sexual relations of people. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The novel was not a work of pure fiction, but included real people and information presented as “fact”. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
In short, the Ohio Supreme Court held that to be assignable, noncompetes must say so. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Also, Orphan Drug exclusivity only applies to rare diseases (affecting less than 200,000 people in the US and fewer than 5 people per 10,000 in the EU) [and is] shorter than average patent protection (12 years). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
We are skeptical that Heckler v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:19 am
From yesterday's decision in Scofield v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida Denied Preliminary Injunction,
31 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Fla.) in Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
In short, by suing the people who tried to help her, she may be hurting every other copyright holder in the world. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
In short, no. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
On first read, it looks to me like the court unanimously removed any ambiguity--the short answer is "no. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:40 pm
In this case, the main decision of interest is the Cartoon Network, LP v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:11 pm
Rather, the purpose was to ensure that the people have the means of effecting violent revolution against the government. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:06 am
The Biden people may believe that risk outweighs any short-term political advantage that might be gained here. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:19 pm
Thankfully, there is no real prospect that the Court will come up that short. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
