Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 19,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
The Conglomerate is hosting a symposium on last month’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
Dukes, Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:46 pm
The reason is that the President is a public official and under the New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
While a strong majority support Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
We failed you.Iqbal v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
Dai and Garland v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm
Byrne v Harwood-Delgardo. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Woods; Adamson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:24 am
Tests applied by courts considering vacating an arbitration awardRecore v Chateaugay CSD, 256 AD2d 801, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 93 NY2d 957In Recore v Chateaugay Central School District, the Chateaugay district asked to have an arbitrator’s award vacated. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision in Diaz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:57 pm
Rector (free speech) and U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
I suspect I am not the only observer who had a strong sense of de ja vu, when they saw this filing. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Modifying a disciplinary penaltyBrown v Penn Yan CSD, 275 AD2d 931Knight v BOCES, App. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
KSR v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
– Estate of Chet Baker v Sony (Excess Copyright) When a ‘Substantial Payment’ is not enough: Gutter Filter Company L.L.C. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
" People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 (2003). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The Tribunal accepted DECC’s evidence that whilst there was a strong public interest in having a debate about the costs of an increased target, the Turner report figures provided a robust basis for that debate and the premature publication of the Government’s internal views on the costs would not add very much. [read post]
