Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 8,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
Here's a look at handful of hot-topic items we've seen on JD Supra in this last week of June:- SCOTUS Overturns California's "Violent Video Games" LawFrom Davis Wright Tremaine: "The Supreme Court's June 27, 2011, decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
The Sacramento Bee reports that the state of California will ultimately incur legal costs of nearly two million dollars related to last year’s decision in the violent video games case, Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
California (1973) (obscenity) United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
And in the New Rambler, Peter Conti Brown’s The Federal Reserve’s Big Bang and the Challenge of Institutional History covers America’s Bank: The Epic Struggle to Create the Federal Reserve by Roger Lowenstein. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Rights work has often been fiercely criticized for its replication of the posture of “white men saving brown women from brown men’, as Gyatri Spivak famously phrased it. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 2:02 am
” Howard v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
As Professor Maldonado points out, anti-miscegenation laws were, at one point or another between 1661 and 1967, in effect in 41 states. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 2:09 pm
See Castleberry & Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:34 pm
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
An opinion piece for the New York Times defends the Court’s decision in the animal cruelty case, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:52 am
Notwithstanding the permissive language of rule 74.15(2), case law suggests that notice should be provided in the absence of “extraordinary urgency” requiring that it be dispensed with. [2] For instance, in Ignani v Ignani, Justice Brown opined that in the absence of extraordinary urgency justifying an ex parte Order for Assistance, the moving party should be required to give notice.[3] In making this statement, Justice Brown considered the nature of the… [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
By Colleen V. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
As long as it is readily identifiable in that search, it appears that this should form part of the CGK.The traditional approachMore fundamentally, the approach in Teva is stated as an updating of traditional guidance from the authorities, but one can question whether those authorities are characterised correctly. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
The Defendants state that the Agreement was "intentionally not docketed. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
See State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm
Chinn v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:32 am
The argument surfaced in a recent unpublished case, State v. [read post]
