Search for: "People v. Howes"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 31,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2014, 9:15 am
Put differently, they do not believe that “[t]he people acting as a body are capable of making better decisions by pooling their knowledge, experience, and insight, than any subset of the people acting as a body and pooling the knowledge, experience, and insight of the members of the subset. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that Aboriginal title includes “the right to decide how the land will be used” and “the right to pro-actively use and manage the land” and reaffirmed the importance of Indigenous laws and land tenure systems as a source of Aboriginal title. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am
" They give particular attention to patents and access and benefit sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity to demonstrate how these laws operate to exclude Indigenous peoples' own ontologies and customary laws, and how the law:[treats] Indigenous people's knowledge as mere information that only comes to be legitimate knowledge when it is used to benefit the ends of corporations or institutions; or else by assuming that… [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:39 pm
McKenna v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:36 pm
Leduc v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:10 am
Romano v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Eric Wright v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that in their latest filing, the challengers in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
Gresham and Arkansas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:08 am
People do not celebrate or enjoy backwardness. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Because both AT&T v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Do you believe that 74 million people will accept that? [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:30 am
Gerald D. or Troxel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
” The article discusses an evidentiary ruling in the unpublished case of People v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:57 am
Buchanan Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:06 am
I'm going to ask you what people ask us criminal defense lawyers all the time, how do you sleep at night? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:49 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
