Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 17,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 2:34 pm
Additional counts were dropped as part of a plea agreement. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
Hunter pleads guilty to one count of conspiracy to misuse campaign funds, meaning (according to me) that he has effectively admitted to all 200 of the overt acts alleged in that count. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
Woodhull v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:52 am
Kobman v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
See, State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
Count V: Failure to Make Repairs. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
The court, in denying the motion, further erred in basing its decision on People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:23 pm
USA v Adamov, 2008 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:06 am
When the Supreme Court hears argument Monday morning in Coleman-Bey v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:18 am
Gunn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:26 pm
A plethora of smart treatises so state. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
If the E.R.A. rescissions are overlooked for purposes of counting to 38, then it becomes harder to deny that the four recent rescissions of Article V applications can be overlooked for purposes of counting to 34—putting us on the brink of our first-ever Article V convention.The puzzles don’t end there. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
If the E.R.A. rescissions are overlooked for purposes of counting to 38, then it becomes harder to deny that the four recent rescissions of Article V applications can be overlooked for purposes of counting to 34—putting us on the brink of our first-ever Article V convention.The puzzles don’t end there. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
There’s something particularly remarkable about NLRB v. [read post]
