Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 6201 - 6220 of 6,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm by David Zaring
Title V, Private Company Flexibility and Growth. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Similarly, we make a strong distinction between stocks and bonds on the one hand and decorative wealth objects such as jewelry and artwork on the other. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
In 2020, Purdue pleaded guilty to felony violations for conspiracy to defraud the Unites States and to violate the anti-kickback statute (AKS), admitting to paying prescribers kickbacks to induce them to prescribe OxyContin and to misrepresenting to the DEA that Purdue maintained an effective anti-diversion program when, in actuality, Purdue marketed OxyContin to over 100 health care providers who the company knew were diverting opioids, and agreed to pay $5.5 in criminal fines and… [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am by Hanibal Goitom
Currently, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, India is the world’s biggest exporter of beef. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm by Paul Levy
  In a recent case, however, it was a federal magistrate judge who was the weak link, failing failed to ensure sufficient protection for the free speech rights of foreign nationals who used United States Service providers for their commentary. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am by Jeff Gamso
"  In Ohio, that plus is one of 10 specifications.(1) The offense was the assassination of the president of the United States or a person in line of succession to the presidency, the governor or lieutenant governor of this state, the president-elect or vice president-elect of the United States, the governor-elect or lieutenant governor-elect of this state, or a candidate for any of the offices described in this division. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  A RR ≤ 2 can be a strong practical argument against specific causation in many cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]