Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 6221 - 6240 of 31,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 4:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Nguyen Opening Brief.pdfDownload Tribe Brief.pdfDownload GAL Brief.pdfDownload Lower court materials here. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:14 pm by Rick Kabra
Our first divorce settlement tip recommended that when calculating spousal support, you start with available cash, or disposable (after-tax) income. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Sinnott v Sinnott, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1901679, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:55 pm
You know it's an ugly and disturbing case when the lawsuit involves a four-year old disabled child and the final paragraph of the opinion reads: "AFFIRMED as to the denial of qualified immunity on the head beating and slamming claims; REVERSED as to the denial of qualified immunity on the unexplained bruises, scratches, and shoeless walks claims; and REMANDED for further proceedings. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm by Stephen Page
The case, Taglieri v Monasky involved a court order for the return of a child who was 2 months when taken from Italy by her mother to the US to be returned to Italy. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 2:24 pm by Andrew Delaney
A different "two-step" analysisQuinones v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:18 am by Shrivar Chendip
This blog was co-authored by Raees Halim, Candidate Attorney In NDB obo JWK v Road Accident Fund, evidence was led to assess loss of future earnings of the plaintiff’s minor son, who sustained dire injuries from a motor vehicle collision five years before. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:05 am by Michelle O'Neil
  Read the opinions here: IN THE INTEREST OF DAA-B A CHILD Pavan v Smith Treto v Treto   [read post]