Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6221 - 6240 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 6:24 pm by AALRR
Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision reversing a trial court order requiring the defendant employer to provide to the plaintiff alleging he was discriminated against because of his age detailed information about the employer's current and former employees and set forth steps trial courts must take to protect the privacy rights of current and former employees who are not parties to the lawsuit. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Ontario Superior Court entered a default judgment against them, awarding $75,000 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:54 pm by Shahram Miri
Cynthia asserted this claim through a Marvin action in Tuolumne County Superior Court, much to the dismay of Bob and Sally, the intestate heirs to the sandwich shop. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
Superior Court, which had held that most class action waivers in employment agreements are unconscionable. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Bruce Nye
  Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148,  where the Cal Supremes held that "at least under some circumstances, the law in California is that class action waivers in consumer contracts of adhesion are unenforceable, whether the consumer is being asked to waive the right to class action litigation or the right to classwide arbitration” and that “the FAA [does not preempt] California law in this respect. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:05 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (Holland) (July 7, 2011) --- Cal.App.4th ----, 2011 WL 2641699, presents a discrete split shift issue. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The decision does not even cite Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 7:51 pm by Michael Atkins
However, a ‘forum selection clause does not deprive a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]