Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 6221 - 6240 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 11:05 am
Two common ways to immigrant to the United States are through an employer, or through a qualifying relative. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court activity has limited the ability of overseas plaintiffs to bring securities class action claims within the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here is the Cellmark report, taken from the public files of the United States Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:55 pm by Richard D. Friedman
I do not believe that it is coincidental that petitioner’s counsel – also highly responsible and very aware of and conscientious about the strictures of Illinois discovery law – proposed lodging the report and the State’s Attorney opposed it. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
  Also, the petitioner in Salem v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
  At some point thereafter, the United States moved him to Bagram in Afghanistan. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:37 am by Matthew Kolken
Dever Amicus brief of Thomas More Law Center Amicus brief of Justice and Freedom Fund Amicus brief of Arizona State Legislature Petitioner's reply Kolken & Kolken [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Jason
The initial claims for asbestos related diseases were filed as workers’ compensation claims in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Day.Representing Appellee/Appellant (Respondent/Cross-Petitioner): Gregory A. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Thomas Merrill
  Justice Ginsburg was primarily puzzled about why the United States did not intervene in the proceedings below, given that its title to the submerged land was at issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (2010) (“[The petitioner] argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence and the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-7029, and Cain v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:21 pm by Antoinette Konski
Government argued as amicus curiae for the perspective of the United States and the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
 This week, the New York  Times wrote a short article informing its readers of the case that is going before the United States Supreme Court out of California, Martel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Arguments at the United States Supreme Court continued on December 6, 2011, as the justices heard oral arguments for the case of Sandy Williams, Petitioner v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Ronald Mann
The most noteworthy point in the argument came almost immediately after Benjamin Horwich rose to argue for the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:18 am by admin
Abrams, California has Proposition 13, which though among the most asinine referenda ever enacted, tends to leave the state with very low real estate taxes – among the reasons why your state is broke. [read post]