Search for: "United States v. Peoples"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 22,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Securing the nation is no longer a matter of protecting against physical invaders at the borders (a situation in which the United States has had tremendous geographic advantages compared with most other nations). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Question: Henson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:57 pm
Federal Trade Commission and People of the State of New York, by James, v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The framers of the United States Constitution recognised this, understanding the people ‘not as rulers, but as judges able to check the legislature’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Randall (1958), which struck down a denial of a property tax exemption to people and organizations that "advocate[] the overthrow of the Government of the United States . . . by . . . violence . . . or who advocate[] the support of a foreign government against the United States in the event of hostilities": [A] discriminatory denial of a tax exemption for engaging in speech is a limitation on free speech. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
The Blaine Amendments found in most state constitutions, including Montana’s, resulted from Blaine’s failed attempt to amend the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
When that was unsuccessful, Midland subsequently made a request to the United States Supreme Court to review the decision of the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
When that was unsuccessful, Midland subsequently made a request to the United States Supreme Court to review the decision of the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Related: Edwin’s Multimedia Wrongful Conviction Syllabus Misdemeanors by Alexandra Natapoff Punishment Without Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal by Alexandra Natapoff Queer (in)justice: the criminalization of LGBT people in the United States by Joey L. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
