Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 2:08 pm
(I think that, even in the absence of the Free Exercise Clause that were made in that case, but that might be unavailable in many states following Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Judge stopped father's evidence, stating that he had failed to show cause to support a change of residence. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
This qualified authority, unlike the power often exercised in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the English Crown, is limited to the promotion of advances in the “useful arts. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
These have important long-term implications for the international defense strategies of the United States and other Western democracies. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am
Article 31(1) VCLT states that "A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm
The essay appears below (original Spanish along with my English translation). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
See for example Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:48 am
Enclosed is an English language and a Chinese language version of the FCPA manual. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
> 10th Cir.o o Refusal to take lessons to improve English did not cause dischargeZokari v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
” But elsewhere, he recognized that English courts frequently enjoined publications that infringed on copyright. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
; Boston.com; Connecticut Employment BlogMartin v. [read post]
