Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
In the UK, we have had a number of high profile libel cases and a report by Pen and the Index on Censorship that have focused attention on the existing state of English libel law. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In Goodwin v United Kingdom (2002) the Strasbourg Court held that this inability of the English law to recognise and give effect to a change of gender through gender re-assignment surgery was a violation of a person’s Article 8 rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
Claim 7 of 904 stated that "[the canister] includes a gel-forming substance which is capable of immobilising drainage fluids within the canister". [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
“The Policy” (as the Panel in Aubert France SA v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Johnson & Johnson and RoC International S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm
Viacom and—separately—the English Premier League sued YouTube and Google alleging that they were liable for infringing works that users posted on YouTube. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
As Jay noted here, Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
Stone Cellars v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The English courts have been grappling with how far to take this. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
As Abella, J. notes in MacGyver v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
In the process, the judge rejects the double actionability rule of the English common law (par 113). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
Aristotle International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:48 am
The case, incidentally, is Stevenson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
The Texas Supreme Court, in 1983, in the case, English v. [read post]
