Search for: "People v. Part" Results 6261 - 6280 of 25,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Notably, the First Department relied on an inference as part of its reasoning on the intervening cause analysis. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
Notably, the First Department relied on an inference as part of its reasoning on the intervening cause analysis. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye general acceptance test, however, continues to be the standard for determining reliability and admissibility of expert testimony in New York (see People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:53 am
Aggravating indeed.Seems like there's lots of recalls on the news nowadays and the mere existence on the news can help people understand both the reality and the prevalence of defective products in our society. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that I say “twice” because the proposed law simply calls for “repeatedly committing acts over a period of time,” and “repeatedly” both seems to just mean “more than once,” and has been so interpreted in a closely related telephone harassment statute, see People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:41 pm
I don't want to rehash the fox v. hedgehog debate. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Gaye’s distinguished service to the Department and the people it serves spanned 30 years. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 8:06 am by Joe Mullin
The first is the creation of the inter partes review system, in 2012; and next, the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallDuring the Supreme Court's oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 9:54 am
Only the Court's pompous official culture could explain why the Justices in the majority of Bush v. [read post]