Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6261 - 6280
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Weston Houck of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, ordered that the trademark infringement and declaratory relief action -- originally brought in State court by Bishop Mark Lawrence's Diocese and its parishes, but "removed" to federal court by the Episcopal Church in South Carolina -- be returned to State court for further adjudication. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:31 pm
United States, 564 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In affidavit evidence accepted by the Board, the calendars associated with the Mark were manufactured in the United States by MWV Consumer & Office Products, a division of the Registrant. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Wells shared the Chairman’s mark, and I shared the transcript of the debate over a defeated amendment that would have permitted GTMO detainees to be transferred to facilities in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm
United States, 690 F.2d 1368,1370 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:38 pm
V. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
Some states in the United States have implemented laws to address school bullying. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Department of Justice NEW YORK—In a Manhattan courtroom, Apple and the Department of Justice gave their opening statements in the e-book price-fixing case United States of America v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Part V then considers the way Western secular states have facilitated this new role for religion in places like Afghanistan. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
According to markings on these documents, the e-mails were printed on August 8, 2009, in the United States. 85. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:40 am
Global Traffic Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
