Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 13,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
., v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Requires Proof of “But For” Causation for Claims Under Americans with Disabilities Act
22 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
On Tuesday, August 20, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a case entitled Murray v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
LEXIS 15247 (ED CA, March 2, 2007), a California federal district court held that plaintiff prisoner had adequately exhausted his administrative remedies as to his complaint that he was prevented from practicing his religion when he was not provided a vegetarian diet.Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 2:00 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 12:45 pm
The opinion is this case (Reginald Clemons v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Officer Samuel E. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:20 am
More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 12:55 am
To prevent this--to ensure that judges rather than administrative staff decide whether a document is adequate-- Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:16 pm
” Cutter v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Environmental Dev v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
” But the Supreme Court has further aggrandized the presidential office. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
With the next administration, he said the controversy escalated. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:40 pm
To the contrary “the terms of probation must be prescribed by the court and not the probation officer”. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:12 am
State Civil Service Commission's action placing certain competitive class positions in the noncompetitive class annulledMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civil Service, 2009 NY Slip Op 31656(U), July 25, 2009 Supreme Court, Albany County, Docket Number: 2144/09, Judge: Joseph C. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:58 am
");see also Camp v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
” With cases like the Court’s 1967's recognition of the “reasonable expectation of privacy” in Katz v. [read post]
