Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6281 - 6300 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 1:21 am by John Day
Superior Court (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1125, 1136 (Gomez), emphasis added.) [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:03 am by Peter Vodola
 This post mentions a 2011 opinion from a Vermont Superior Court judge that addresses the meaning of the term "best interest" in the context of structured settlement protection acts. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
Under the California State Constitution, an original habeas petition can be filed in either the a California county Superior Court, California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:59 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
After several venue transfers, the last of which required approval by the PA Superior Court, the case was returned to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on June 19, 2009. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by Robert Foster
The Appeals Court has affirmed a Superior Court judgment ordering that a house built in violation of both zoning and a previous Superior Court judgment be torn down. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Max Factor
Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 407, 415-416 (2004), citing Foxgate v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
This judgment deals with two English cases, while a separate judgment deals with the Scottish case Eba v Advocate General for Scotland. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Strict Liability 37 & 38 & 39: Animals, Rylands v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:50 am by Matt C. Bailey
On June 20, 2011, the U.S Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s certification decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am by Will Aitchison
As the Court saw it: Defendants, relying on Farmer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Just this morning, the United States Supreme Court released its long-awaited opinion in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by webmaster
The at-issue settlement provided entirely for injunctive relief, whereby Volkswagen agreed to make disclosures about its “smart keys” that the underlying lawsuit, first filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and then removed to federal court under CAFA, had alleged were lacking. [read post]