Search for: "House v. House" Results 6281 - 6300 of 41,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm by National Indian Law Library
Legislation Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/currentleg.htmlS. 1352 - Title: Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2013 [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 pm by Unknown
Traditional Village of Togiak (Banishment; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:01 pm by Unknown
Texas Indian holocaust and survival: McAllen Grace Brethren Church v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The nature of the resolution is surprising because it appears to conflict with the better known decision of the House of Lords, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company, Limited v Selfridge and Company, Limited, which a similarly constituted panel delivered in the same week. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 2:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012), and Alice Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm by Gene Quinn
At least initially, the USPTO instructions to examiners seems extremely patentee friendly, which I must say comes as a surprise given the largely anti-patent rhetoric that has come from the White House over the last 16 months. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:37 pm
" So said Lord Justice Wall, introducing his judgment in Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA Civ 578.The Facts: The parties were an unmarried couple who purchased a property together in 1985. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal followed Rakusen v Jepsen (2020) UKUT 298 (LC), found that the landlord had committed the offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004 and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am by chief
Avon Ground Rents Ltd v (1) Cowley & Others, (2) Metropolitan Housing Trust, (3) Advance, (4) May Hempstead Partnership [2019] EWCA Civ 1827 (no transcript yet on BAILII, we’ve seen a copy on Lawtel) This is an important Court of Appeal decision concerning Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, s.19(2) and the reasonable sum payable in advance on account of works where the landlord may be able in future to recover some of the costs from a third party. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]