Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 6281 - 6300 of 7,666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
"If you're not familiar with Twitter, then you're behind the times. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Re-clarifying the aims and conclusions of the Mashelkar Committee Report (Spicy IP) India: will IP litigation be both 'punctual' and 'faithful'? [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
MetLife argued that the residual goodwill in the mark, plus O'M's bad faith exploitation of the mark, entitled it to relief, but the caselaw didn't support this. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:17 am
Unfortunately, there is no way to mark it as unread. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:15 am
I’m a strong supporter of copyright. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 12:45 am
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:02 pm
To make things a bit more specific I’m going to focus on the facts ofthe  matter  as they pertain to Ohio. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:21 pm
A flourless chocolate express cake hit the mark for dessert. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
Frankly, I don’t think the author of this blog is far off the mark. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:38 pm by Hunter Biederman
  Although visiting judges get the job done for week or two stretches, I'm not sure this is the best idea. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:37 am
We're all paying for it, but no one seems to care. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 4:01 am
Die Eintragung der IR-Marke Chocolat Pavot (fig.) der August Storck KG wurde vom BVerwGer erneut verweigert; die Marke sei für "Confiseries, chocolat et produits chocolatés, pâtisseries" in der Klasse 30 beschreibend und gehöre zum Gemeingut. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:55 pm
The question marks are at WR2 and the flex WR/RB position. [read post]