Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 6281 - 6300 of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
While he may have previewed his position a year ago when he voted to stay the ruling from the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
That may or may not be demonstrated by the parent controlling the subsidiary. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
Under s 3(1) of the Act it is provided that “appropriate national authority” (the Secretary of State in England and the National Assembly in Wales) may enact regulations exempting specified premises or areas within in them from being smoke free. s 3(2) provides that descriptions of premises which may fall under s 3(1) include in particular “any premises where a person has a home… (including hotels, care homes and prisons and other places where… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm by Will Baude
  As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:26 am
App. 1990) (police officer's comment on defendant's refusal to consent to a search without probable cause was constitutional error); People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Adam Zimmerman
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]