Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 44,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
(Indicating) I can only ask the government to go back and talk to people who may have had cases like this, reach out for lawyers who may have left the office and see if there are some solutions out there or some comparisons that can be made because: One, I don't know what it takes to search 15 million documents. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 7:02 am
" But in Church v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the high court held in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
" Kirby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:32 am
New York Time, you may watch on UN WebTV The letter submitted by the Ukraine is available here It should be noted that although the primary formal mechanisms of accountability may be limited, there remain alternative forums, such as fact finding mechanisms, reports by UN human rights treaty and charter bodies as well as European institutions, as well as peoples tribunals. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
[I think the court may has misunderstood what Doe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:36 am
The decision, Oleckna v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:09 am
Co v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 11:03 am
Case citation: Hicks v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:00 am
" Steinhausen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or … even stirs people to anger. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
These other people are sometimes known as informants. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
More than 150 people known to be seeking restitution in the case of the USA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 12:06 pm
The article focused on the recent First Circuit decision, Patco Construction Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
However, the People's use of the conjunction "and/or" between each act means that "a jury could just as easily find that defendants committed only one of the alleged acts; not only would a single act not be sufficient to establish a course of conduct but we still would not know on which particular act defendant was convicted. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:09 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
