Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 6281 - 6300 of 40,854
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
The point indirectly was brought home by Professor Daniel Kleinberger’s recent article for the ABA’s Business Law Section in which he dissects last year’s decision by a Connecticut appellate panel in Manere v Collins interpreting that state’s Revised Uniform LLC Act which expressly includes oppression as one of the grounds for judicial dissolution. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, the Court will hand down judgment in Rittson-Thomas and Ors v Oxfordshire County Council. [read post]
The majority opinion agreed that HB 214 advances each of these interests and produces the benefits intended by the state. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
Josh Hawley of Missouri has introduced the Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act, which a press release stated would take back control from big businesses and “return it to the American people” through cracking down on mergers and mega-acquisitions. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 7:55 am by John Jascob
The court found that the size and seriousness of the write-down combined with other factors was sufficient to show that signers of the company's initial Form 10-K, which denied any overvaluing, acted with severe recklessness (Camelot Event Driven Fund, A Series Of Frank Funds Trust v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme court overturned the decision of the lower court, which stated that the President acted unlawfully. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Use of the common law offence against sit-down demonstrations in the 1960s also seems pertinent. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by James Romoser
During the 1950s and 1960s, the Warren court handed down a flurry of transformational decisions that expanded the rights of minorities, criminal defendants and the press. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”Packingham involved (and there the Court struck down) a state law that restricted some individuals’ access to the Internet. [read post]