Search for: "Will v. United States"
Results 6281 - 6300
of 92,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:45 pm
United... [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
They provide the normative and operational standard for the implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for business and human rights structured around three pillars:[3]• The State duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business enterprises, through policies, regulation and adjudication. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am
Here is the abstract: The Indian Tribes of the United States occupy an often ambiguous place in our legal system, and nowhere is that ambiguity more pronounced than in the realm of state taxation. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 11:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:16 am
United States, 15-1503, involves the rule of Brady v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued perhaps the most significant and far-reaching decision affecting state sales and use tax collection since its Quill v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
Department of Health and Human Servs. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
My oath requires me to apply the law as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
United States, and Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
This decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
