Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 6301 - 6320 of 10,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 3:28 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
IMDB- 7.5/10 Rotten Tomatoes – 8.5/10 Enlace para un vistazo de The Loving Story (2011) por Zoán Dávila Roldán [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
V, c. 4, which forms a part of the constitution of Canada in virtue of the Schedule to the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
The CFPB acknowledges in the final rule that (a) none of the 562 class actions it studied was tried on the merits, (b) only 12.3% of the class actions had final settlements approved during the study period, (c) the average cash payment to settlement class members was $32 and (d) the attorneys for the plaintiffs were paid $424,495,451. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Spokane Arcades, Inc. (1985): "the [a] average person, [b] applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, [c] taken as a whole, [d] appeals to the prurient interest" (which means a "shameful or morbid" interest in sex as opposed to a "normal, healthy" interest); "the work depicts or describes, [a] in a patently offensive way [under [b] contemporary community standards], [c] sexual conduct… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
The court then GVR’d (granted, vacated and remanded) in two cases raising the same issue, Bazan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:48 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
§§ 1322(d) and 1325(b) – which do relate back to § 707(b)(2) – and has been used to determine the size of plan payments (i.e., the amount on line 59 of Form 22C). [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:29 am by David Oliver
b) In such cases "liability does not run through the warning label" so Pliva v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:04 am by FDABlog HPM
”  The counterclaim provision refers to “patent information” submitted by the NDA holder under FDC Act § 505(b) or § 505(c). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:11 am by Susan Brenner
Code §§ 2252(a)(4)(B) and 2252(b)(2), and two counts of distribution in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:39 am by Mi Patente
Y si además se suma el hecho de que una jurisprudencia constante estipula que este conocimiento debe ser automático e inmediato, es decir sin necesidad de efectuar búsquedas ni investigaciones, la respuesta no puede ser más que negativa. [read post]