Search for: "ANDREW DOE" Results 6301 - 6320 of 9,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
  A quite slender book, it does not purport to offer a comprehensive theory of patriotism across vast times or space; instead, it is basically a heartfelt missive to his fellow Americans (and, perhaps, fellow academics) about what can be said about American patriotism at this particular juncture in our history. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
But if it were it to happen, I suspect that the answer would be that the president’s pardon power does not extend to criminality. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:17 am
Could AI be an ‘inventor’, or does inventiveness require human involvement? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
How does the parliamentary system account to itself from out of the apparatus it itself has fashioned to further its own supremacy? [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:00 pm by Howard Knopf
So – let us hope that Alexander Gay’s successor in this file in the appeal process does just as vigorous and competent a job as Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:56 am by Guest Blogger
The feature does not post any updates or even record any audio without the user's knowledge and consent. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:29 pm by J. Dana Stuster
A spokesman from CENTCOM told Vox that the U.S. military does not know whether U.S. munitions were used or if U.S. planes refueled the coalition planes that carried out the strike; Gen. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:51 am by Aditya Bamzai
  On Lawfare, the issue has been addressed by Andrew Kent and David Kris. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
 Determine whether there are any other factors that make it appropriate to grant a mandatory injunction at an interim stage (even if the court does not feel highly assured that the claimant will establish its right). [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:29 am by Andrew Delaney
Bolaski, 2014 VT 36 By Andrew Delaney Defendant gets his second-degree murder conviction reversed without getting to the final issue he raises in the case. [read post]
Ultimately, the Court has ruled that S. 3(d) does apply to biochemical substances but that the Explanation to S. 3(d) does not apply to the claimed invention and that Novozymes appeal should be allowed in part. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
Both sides were represented by experienced specialist costs counsel (Mr Andrew Post and Mr Simon P Browne). [read post]