Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 6301 - 6320
of 182,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2019, 4:55 am
The BA decision in T 1218/14 therefore provides an interesting nuance to the criteria under which an undisclosed disclaimer will be allowed. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 9:00 am
I have now read the interesting opinions concurring and dissenting from the Eleventh Circuit's decision not to hear en banc a crack sentence ruling (available at this link). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:23 am
We wouldn’t practice patent law if we didn’t like statistics, at least a bit—and past blog entries have made that clear. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
The most interesting thing about it isn’t the book itself: It was hastily written (Chua says that she wrote most of it in eight weeks), and it shows. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 1:30 pm
Please forward on to European colleagues you think might be interested. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
[The defendant had alleged that he, his family, and his lawyer had been threatened by the public, but the Ohio Supreme Court concluded that the trial court wasn't given adequate evidence to justify sealing.] [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:29 am
They should all be really important defenses but for reasons I won't get into here, they just aren't. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:57 pm
Tomorrow’ WSJ has an interesting story that sheds light both on why we haven’t seen prosecutions from the recent financial crisis, and why we saw so many before that. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
A 24(2) serves this principle as it requires a Board member who believes that (s)he cannot take part in the proceedings for such a reason to inform the Board. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
So that principle basically says you can't do that kind of thing, even if it's network management to deal with congestion problems. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:11 am
If he argues that we can't achieve anything there, that's a different matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:18 pm
But what I’ve found is that you can’t zealously represent your client if there is any potential for a conflict. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Custody orders aren’t necessarily set in stone. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:11 am
” Baltimore’s interests in fighting deceptive advertising and preventing the health risks that can accompany delays in abortions were “plainly important. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:39 am
And that's just from interest and penalties. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:02 pm
The interests of justice require that the Rules of Professional Responsibility be honored. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 2:08 pm
I have no doubt he is an interesting person. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:43 am
Richard was an FBI agent.He's a resident at Mom's memory care facility. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:17 am
If foreign companies poach American workers to work remotely, they might know something you don't. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:02 am
The order reads more like a proposed rule of an administrative agency, both in its specificity and in the way that it gives interested parties (though in this instance only the parties of record) time to offer their thoughts before a final decision is taken.I don't see why this case is different from any other where the Court ends up using a legal theory that was not briefed or argued. [read post]
