Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 6301 - 6320
of 7,666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 6:09 pm
Ben Kruskal: Well that is certainly a big question mark. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:47 am
This week's Chroncile Review has an essay by Mark Lilla, "Taking the Right Seriously," that you may be interested in. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:23 pm
Brave man, I guess I'm a coward. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:34 pm
If you think your criminal case is an easy one and you’re right, I’m not going to have much fun and you’re not going to be grateful. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 6:56 am
Mark Twain was penniless many times over; Ulysses S. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
I'm just afraid that we're not going to learn from our past mistakes, and all we're going to wind up with is another bloated budget, and a big stack of "CYA" paperwork to show how we ended right back where we started. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
[M]erely because two products are attached or used together does not necessarily mean they are closely related. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Castro v Cartwright (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(e)(2) refusal of PROFUMO DE FIRENZE for perfume, finding double entendre: In re Atelier Profumo Artistico Firenze SrL (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms failure-to-function refusal of STRENGTH IN DATA for brochures: In re ImClone Systems Incorporated (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) r [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 11:33 pm
"Only assets acquired after a marriage would be divided, but with no division at all in the case of marriages of three years or less" - I'm probably with Baroness Deech on the first part of this (although absolute rules make me nervous), but the second part would lead to absurd pressures as marriages reach the three-year mark, with (say,) husbands rushing off to court to issue divorce proceedings before their third anniversary. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Here, the similarity of marks factor alone was dispositive. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
Hey, we're people. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
As for fashion, the topic comes up at the 23:30 mark and then the 26:00 mark of the video clip. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
In re E. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:28 pm
I'm not paying them. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:53 pm
So now I'm back, pencils sharpened. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:30 pm
I'm encouraged by our efforts with the Ad Council to promote physical activity among young people. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
From 1951-1958, the glacier, which flows into suburban Juneau, has retreated 1,900 feet (580 m). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
Sometimes true, depending on things I'm not really sure about. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:15 pm
" But then, I'm not a TTAB judge.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 1:06 pm
" No and no.I'm no expert, but you don't have to be. [read post]
