Search for: "State v. Core" Results 6301 - 6320 of 7,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Recently, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a 2010 ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court, did not have the constitutional authority to decide a state law claim brought by a debtor against a creditor, even though the matter was part of the “core” statutory jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by randal shaheen
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., the core issue in the case -- and a crucial issue for practitioners. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Eric
" This is at least the second time a state's highest court has split 4-3 on a 230 case--the old Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:32 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the District of Columbia will hear Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]