Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 7,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (click here for details of the General Court's decision and here for the grounds of appeal). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:51 pm
Holder (docket 08-681), was not turned up by the government. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
The case, Kaplan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
" The current holder of the franchise for scholarly biography of Wilson, Arthur S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:02 am
Jan Brewer’s lawsuit challenging her own state’s medical marijuana law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Consider the recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
The case is styled, Hodges v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
They didn’t think women should vote.A lot of what the original Constitution was about was constraining the power of the states to pass laws beneficial to debtor farmers in a time of economic distress and expanding the power of the national government to that it could efficiently raise taxes in order to pay off government bond holders, who often were merely speculators in such debt rather than initial suppliers of credit. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
” The content of the redemption notices need not be elaborate Sneil, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:37 am
Bank v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
V–Sketch of the Geology of Mississippi Art. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:37 am
Bank v. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 1:03 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:54 am
United States and Hirabayashi v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 9:00 am
Such was the case in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:46 am
Supreme Court considered the reach of this statute in Holder v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm
The Graham Factors In a blow to General Motors and other current and aspiring design patent holders and patent lawyers the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just ruled in LKQ CORPORATION v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
