Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 6301 - 6320
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 12:57 am
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
In that case, Judge Vito Titone rejected the idea that "artificial legal distinctions" should govern when partners are, in fact, members of a family unit. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:47 pm
Last year, almost 164,000 relatives of green-card holders from around the world immigrated to the United States or received green cards here. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
The changes left the plan boundaries intact and did not change the total number of residential units or maximum non-residential uses. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
In AFFIRMING the motion court's denial of NYCM's petition for a stay of the SUM arbitration, the Third Department agreed with the lower court that NYCM had not met its heavy burden of showing "that it acted diligently in seeking to bring about [respondent's] co-operation; that the efforts employed by [petitioner] were reasonably calculated to obtain [respondent's] co-operation; and that the attitude of [respondent], after [her] co-operation was sought, was one of… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:31 pm
The other alternative, advanced by Assistant to the Solicitor General Eric Feigin on behalf of the United States, would produce what Justice Scalia described as an “absolutely weird” theory of administrative review in which the MSPB, despite lacking jurisdiction over a facial constitutional challenge to a statutory employment bar, is nevertheless responsible for fact-finding, with plenary “appellate” review by the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:45 pm
The state court referred to as a juvenile court in 8 C.F.R. section 204.11(a) means “a court located in the United States having jurisdiction under State law to make judicial determinations about the custody and care of juveniles. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
United States (Docket No. 12-983, Term 2014), and appeal from the US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the state of mind requirement needed to support criminal prosecution. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
Halleck (Feb. 25): Whether the private operator of a public-access television channel is a “state actor” – that is, someone who is acting on behalf of the government — who can therefore be sued for violations of the First Amendment United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
United States (Docket No. 12-983, Term 2014), and appeal from the US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the state of mind requirement needed to support criminal prosecution. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
Courts inside and outside the United States are weighing questions regarding jurisdiction and immunity, and their decisions and arguments will likely be picked up by other courts dealing with issues of corporate responsibility for alleged human rights violations. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:09 pm
Flag of TennesseeThe United States won World War II. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:33 am
How to Write an I601 Extreme Hardship Waiver Argument If you’ve been found inadmissible to the United States or to adjust your status due to certain immigration violations, you may be eligible to apply for an I601 Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
The United States Supreme Courtdenied certiorari. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:33 am
The panel noted that, in the first set of circumstances, the subsidy was available with respect to goods produced within the United States that are exported, but ‘‘the subsidy is not available in relation to goods produced within the United States sold for use within the United States[.] . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
Discussing this case specifically, she described the dispute as having the “United States written all over it. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
