Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 6321 - 6340 of 13,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm by David Oscar Markus
As Mark Joseph Stern wrote in Slate, this ruling won’t help Judge Newsom’s chances for being appointed to the Supreme Court in a Republican administration—but it shows that he’s a principled and independent jurist. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Like us, those courts found that "alphanumeric combinations provide identifiers for public, law enforcement, and administrative purposes" and therefore have historically been used to convey government speech. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:58 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The present case was concerned not with an unlawful administrative act but with an order of a tribunal, and so gives rise to different issues and is governed by different principles. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
On Monday, March 19, the Justices will hear oral argument in Wilkie v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm by Gabriel Chin
   As the Court held in University of Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, the Supreme Court is conferring this very day about whether to take up Baker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
  Referring to AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer [2009] EWCA Civ 634, in which it was said that hardship does not of itself render a matter disproportionate, especially where alternative provision for exceptional cases is made (Kay LJ, at [29]). [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am by Lyle Denniston
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:11 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  The court in the instant matter confirmed that to the extent the trial court decision of Gilligan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v County of Erie, et al., 210 AD2d 933, a probationary police officer injured during training was held eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v County of Erie, et al., 210 AD2d 933, a probationary police officer injured during training was held eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits. [read post]