Search for: "Roll v. Roll"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 6,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
It does this in a few different ways – some of which appear to be effective immediately, and some of which will roll out over time. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
This is partly because Strasbourg’s guidance is not very clear [our interview took place before the ECHR’s recent decision in Firth & Ors v UK (App No 47784/09)] and also because our sentencing legislation is such a minefield. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am
The Biden Administration rolled out policy changes that are continuing to take shape through executive orders, legislative efforts, agency rulemaking, and enforcement litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
The decline has been even steeper in federal district courts.Cases like Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:01 am
Public Service v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
LET us go then, you and I,When the evening is spread out against the skyLike a patient etherized upon a table;Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,The muttering retreats Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotelsAnd sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:Streets that follow like a tedious argumentOf insidious intentTo lead you to an overwhelming question…. [read blog]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
One Committee member (Ruth Edwards M.P.) responded that she did not think that any element of the conspiracy theory could be categorised as ‘harmless’, because “it is threatening public confidence in the 5G roll-out” — a proposition with which the DCMS Minister Caroline Dinenage agreed. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
MAY 13, 2013 Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh The undersigned parties are committed to the goal of a safe and sustainable Bangladeshi ReadyMade Garment ("RMG") industry in which no worker needs to fear fires, building collapses, or other accidents that could be prevented with reasonable health and safety measures. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
The Robust Use of FISA Section 702 Continues One surveillance authority that has not seen the reductions reflected in FISA Title I (electronic surveillance), Title III (physical search) and Title V (business records and tangible things) applications is the collection activity conducted under the authority of FISA § 702. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
State and State v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
During a vote or call of the roll in the House, each proxy is allowed to vote on behalf of the members they are representing so long as they acknowledge their proxy status and have received “exact instruction[s]” from the absent member they are representing in advance. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
Target v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
The Robust Use of FISA Section 702 Continues One surveillance authority that has not seen the reductions reflected in FISA Title I (electronic surveillance), Title III (physical search) and Title V (business records and tangible things) applications is the collection activity conducted under the authority of FISA § 702. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
A&E Television Networks, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
In response to public outcry, the order instead requires the secretary of homeland security to detain immigrant families together “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations” and directs the Justice Department to amend the consent decree reached in Flores v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
