Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 6321 - 6340 of 17,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm by Amy Howe
Michael Dreeben, the deputy solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, faced a slightly more (but not completely) receptive audience. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
"Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to the unlawful sexual intercourse count and the remaining counts were dismissed. . . . [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Obtaining property by deception and theft of under $10,000 Tried by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, appellant, Bobbie Sue Lewis, was convicted of six counts of obtaining property by deception of an individual at least 68 years old, five counts of theft less ... [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am by Rory Little
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of New Mexico (D.N.M.): 60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv 64-nm-motion-to-stay 65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order 66-response-to-60 69-nm-motion-to-modify 71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv 72-motion-to-dismiss-count-ii 73-motion-to-dismiss-count-v 79-reply-in-support-of-60 85-response-to-65 86-response-to-72 87-response-to-71 88-response-to-69 89-response-to-73 90-response-to-64 94-reply-in-support-of-69 95-reply-in-support-of-73… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
The state court held that it was bound by a 2011 California Intermediate Appellate Court decision in the case of Luther v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:25 am by Chip Merlin
Only the Almighty knows for certain where Hurricane Matthew is going, and I would not count out anywhere from Florida and up the eastern seaboard of the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Mr Bukovsky was charged with five counts of making an indecent photograph of a child, contrary to section 1(a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978, five counts of possession of indecent photographs of children contrary to section 160 Criminal Justice Act 1988, and one count of possessing a prohibited image contrary to section 62(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. [read post]