Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6321 - 6340
of 13,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States, which was argued less than a month before the election, on October 11, 1944. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:51 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision to hear Tyson Foods v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:59 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Clapper v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:37 am
This was what was alleged in the recent case of Perez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:11 pm
(Briseno v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
CalPERS explained that the recent federal district court decision (State of California v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 8:44 pm
On the eve of a status report requested by Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California in the Oracle v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Bernal, Judge of the United States District Court, Central District of California.Historical and personal perspectives will be presented by Ms. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Rev. 1065 (1997). [7] Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
United States, 133 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
I am an attorney, licensed to practice law in California (and also to appear in a number of federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
Judge Hamilton of the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted Netflix's motions holding that all five patents were invalid. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
That is the rule of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
