Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 6341 - 6360 of 8,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am by William Carleton
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily Looking back at a key Supreme Court decision about gay rights The real-life namesake of Martin Sheen’s ‘West Wing’ president Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:47 am by umlaw
It played an important role in the breaking down of barriers to education at other University of Maryland Schools and helped Thurgood Marshall to develop the arguments that would come to the fore in the Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:05 pm
By Mike Dorf As I discussed yesterday, Monday's Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
Hackney London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 789, 796 [CA, per Simon Brown LJ]) or as something else; indeed, the Supreme Court of Ireland, in A (A), supra, at p. 315, describes the discussion on this as merely a matter of ‘taxonomy’. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:28 am by alath
For example, an unusually broad non-disclosure agreement that defined ‘confidential information’ as any information that is ‘usable in’ or ‘relates to’ the securities industry was held to be too broad, as it effectively prevents a worker from ever working in securities trading (Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
A recent pair of cases brings this issue back into our sights, because they so squarely show the clash between the "literal language" line of reasoning and the opposing "ignore the language to prevent absurdity" rationale.Thus, in Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Cellular Telephone Co., 20 Cal.4th 163 (1999) (adoption in California of the antitrust injury requirement, citing the dicta in Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]